Cannot bind packed field

Author: bsfw

August undefined, 2024

WebDec 17, 2024 · Failed build (cannot bind packed field) on Ubuntu · Issue #6568 · rethinkdb/rethinkdb · GitHub rethinkdb / rethinkdb Public Notifications Fork 1.9k Star 25.8k Code Issues 1.3k Pull requests 8 Actions Wiki Security Insights New issue Failed build (cannot bind packed field) on Ubuntu #6568 Closed Tracked by #7067 WebNov 30, 2024 · JUCE compile errors on Linux - juce::PixelARGB::getAlpha() cannot bind packed field Describe your environment OS: Pop!_OS 19.10 DAW: n/a Plugin: n/a Audio: n/a etc.: occurs on masterand on latest commit (09f3d8eon branch origin/dev/v1.0.7) Describe the problem or the feature request Steps to reproduce clone and compile per …

c++ - universal references and packed fields - Stack Overflow

WebMar 12, 2006 · Subject: Re: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: on mips: error: cannot bind packed field. Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 01:17:12 +0000 [Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)] tags 356767 +patch thanks The GCC structure packing extension cannot be used with non-POD classes. This restriction doesn't seem to be applied consistently, and as a result par2cmdline only … WebJul 24, 2024 · Apparently, the C++ standards changed at some point, and referencing into a packed struct, means that you cannot guarantee alignment, which could cause issues on some architectures that do not permit unaligned accesses, so GCC decided that this dictates that the code should be prevented from compiling. little bits circuit toys

c++ - Error: "cannot bind packed field" while inserting …

WebDec 17, 2024 · src/serializer/log/metablock_manager.cc:359:61: error: cannot bind packed field ‘mb->crc_metablock_t::version’ to ‘long int&’ … WebJan 30, 2024 · There should be no issue with packing. Why does the compiler think there is an unpacked non-POD field? Everything is packed and class A is declared before B or C. Use of either the reference or the pointer should generate the same code, so why does the compiler think there is a difference w.r.t. packing? Webstruct A { union { int c; } b; } __attribute__ ((packed)); void func(int const &) {} void func(int &) {} int main() { A a; func(a.b.c); } Here is the error: test.C:13: error: cannot bind … little bits classroom set

36566 – Cannot bind packed field - GNU Compiler …

Failed build (cannot bind packed field) on Ubuntu #6568

WebJan 16, 2024 · cannot bind packed field '((QChar*)this)->QChar::ucs' to 'ushort&{aka short unsigned int&}' which is refering to the following part of qstring.h class Q_EXPORT … Webtest.C:13: error: cannot bind packed field 'a.A::b.A::::c' to'int&' GCC 3.4.4, GCC 4.0.2 and Intel's compiler compile this code without an error, Is this an error in the compiler or is there a mistake in the code? int&, then it tries to bind the value to int const & as this is done with temporaries for example. Greetings little bits cartoonWebAlso validated with Cygwin Clang 4.0. All warnings could be safely ignored as the pointers are later reinterpreted as char *.. To avoid regressions due to unnecessary code changes and avoid complaints about the warnings, I would suggest to add this to atacmds.cpp for release 6.6:. #if __clang_major__ >= 4 #pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Waddress-of … littlebits automatic toilet

"WebJul 16, 2003 · It also prevents packing fields of non-pod type when the POD is not packed itself. Whilst, rth's comment 'don't do that then' is fine for explicitly taking the address of a packed field, C++ reference binding happens much more quietly, and some machines silently ignore the LSBs of an unaligned memory address - bleah! " - Cannot bind packed field

c++ - universal references and packed fields - Stack Overflow

c++ - Error: "cannot bind packed field" while inserting …

Cannot bind packed field

Did you know?